By: Richard A. Lazar
Copyright © Readiness Systems, LLC – All rights reserved
WHAT IS THE 3-MINUTE AED RESPONSE TIME TRAP?
Consider this scenario. A person suffers sudden cardiac arrest at a workplace or community location that has automated external defibrillators (AEDs). An AED is retrieved and used 5 minutes after the cardiac arrest is first suspected, but the individual does not survive. A “heart attack lawyer” sues for wrongful death. Should the AED owner be found at fault in this situation for a delay in defibrillation? Well, that depends on how quickly AEDs are expected to be used as judged in negligence cases.
I bring this up because I keep seeing statements – on websites (including those of companies involved in the AED equipment and training industries), in online articles, social media posts and various other places – suggesting AEDs must be used within 3 minutes or less of a sudden cardiac arrest. These suggestions are wrong and provide plaintiffs’ lawyers with ammunition they can use to try and hold AED owners to an unfair response time standard. As a result, these misleading assertions increase the legal risk of owning AEDs by creating what I call the 3-minute AED response time trap.
AED owners can avoid the 3-minute AED response time trap. Read on to find out how.
HOW IS AED RESPONSE TIME DEFINED?
What does the term “AED response time” mean? The national AED Program Design Guidelines define an AED Response Time Objective as the maximum desired elapsed period from the time a suspected sudden cardiac arrest collapse is first reasonably recognized to the time defibrillation therapy is first delivered (Guidelines section 2.10). AED response time includes four distinct time allocation elements: sudden cardiac arrest recognition, request to retrieve an AED, retrieval of an AED and use of an AED (Guidelines section 3.4.2). In an actual cardiac arrest emergency, the total time for these combined activities is the AED response time.
WHAT IS A REASONABLE AED RESPONSE TIME OBJECTIVE?
How quickly should AED owners be expected to use an AED when the question comes up in negligence cases? The answer requires separating the science from the operational realities of having AEDs placed in non-medical settings.
It is certainly true that cardiac arrest survival rates are directly related to how quickly a defibrillator is used. Faster is clearly better from scientific and therapeutic perspectives. But if the science is the sole baseline for setting a legally accountable response time standard, then AED owners (and, by extension, emergency medical services systems) should be required to use an AED within 1-2 minutes. Virtually everyone would agree this is an unreasonable goal operationally and financially.
If 1-2 minutes is an unfair legally accountable response time standard, why is 3 minutes any less so? It seems this number is based purely on the science but without consideration of the many factors that impact actual AED response times in workplace and community settings. Here are some of those factors:
Given these factors, what is a workplace and community AED response time goal that properly balances the benefits of early defibrillation with the need to rationally manage the legal accountability risks of owning AEDs? The AED Response Time Guideline found in section 3.4.3 of the AED Program Design Guidelines suggests the following:
The AED Response Time Objective for each defined AED Response Zone (the area one AED can cover) should have the goal of delivering defibrillation therapy within five (5) minutes or less from the time sudden cardiac arrest is first reasonably suspected.
This 5-minute AED response time goal is consistent with the American Heart Association’s Emergency Cardiac Care Guidelines (2015), which note that cardiac arrest survival rates are highest when bystanders deliver CPR and defibrillation is attempted within 3-5 minutes (page S422) (the AHA does not publish or set AED program operational standards but it does publish science that can be considered when designing AED programs). A 5-minute or less target recognizes that AED programs rely on non-medical people, under no obligation to act, in a setting not primarily focused on emergency medical services. It also recognizes it is impossible to predict how lay bystanders will react when facing cardiac arrest emergencies.
A POLICY THAT PROTECTS ORGANIZATIONS FROM THE 3-MINUTE AED RESPONSE TIME TRAP
For organizations with AEDs, the best way to avoid the 3-minute AED response time trap is to have a written response time policy that incorporates the 5-minute target described above. This policy should also note that the organization’s AED response time objective is a performance goal and not a guarantee.
Keep in mind that an organization’s response time policy is one of many that impact actual response time, and all must be integrated together. Examples include policies relating to response zones, response teams, AED access and use authorization, and number and placement of AEDs, among others. If you need help fully designing your AED program and putting complete policies in place, let me know.
Let me be clear: AED programs should be designed to respond as quickly as is reasonably possible to sudden cardiac arrest emergencies. Nothing in this brief suggests otherwise. That said, risk management is an important goal of AED ownership, and avoiding the 3-minute response time trap is one key to managing risk. A 5-minute AED response time policy properly balances science, practical operations and legal accountability and is the right approach for successful AED programs.